Stackness
Sign up
Meteor

Meteor

Full-stack JavaScript platform with real-time data out of the box

1 member lists Meteor, up 1 in the last 12 weeks, data as of 25 October 2026

Usage on Stackness
1memberup 1 in the last 12 weeks

Members who list Meteor in their Stack, by week.

Be the first to add Meteor

Only test accounts list Meteor so far. Add it to your stack and you're the first member running it.

Sign up and add it
History
Collected from public datasets outside Stackness, not from stacks on this site. Each series is scaled to its own peak because the units do not compare. Data sources
Mentions, yearly

Internet Archive Wayback Machine mentions: 35 mentions (2012) to 302 mentions (2024)

20122015201820212024

Imported from Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Pageviews, monthly

Wikipedia pageviews: 9,701 views (2015) to 1,346 views (2026)

20152018202120232026

Imported from Wikipedia pageviews

About Meteor

License
MIT License
Wikidata
Language
C, C++, JavaScript
Wikidata
First release
20 January 2012
Wikidata
Latest release
3.3, 17 June 2025
Wikidata

Checked 23 October 2026.

R
Ruby Sandoval

@gen_ruby_fan

Moves that use Meteor

I used to write end to end tests for everything. Click this button, fill that form, check the result. It felt safe but every test run took forever and when something broke, all I got was a screenshot showing me a blank form or a missing element. Then I'd have to dig through logs to find which function actually failed. The shift was simple: keep the e2e tests only for the flows that would genuinely tank the business if they stopped working. For me that's user signup, payment processing, and core search. Everything else moved down to integration tests with Vitest where I test the actual functions and API endpoints directly. Now my test suite runs in under a minute instead of ten. When a test fails, Vitest tells me exactly which function broke and why, not just that something on the page is wrong. I can verify a complex checkout flow with an integration test that sets up the database, calls the controller, and checks the response in about thirty lines. The honest caveat is that this approach assumes you have good logging and error handling already in place. If your app swallows errors or logs them poorly, you'll miss bugs that e2e tests would have caught. I also still need the handful of e2e tests because screenshots do catch visual regressions and weird browser quirks that integration tests miss entirely.

75
See all moves that use Meteor