Stackness

Languages & Frameworks tools

Most used tools

  1. #1

    Typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JS

    5 users
  2. #2

    Versatile high-level programming language for all domains

    5 users
  3. #3

    React framework for production with SSR and static generation

    5 users
  4. #4

    Utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development

    5 users
  5. #5

    JavaScript library for building user interfaces

    4 users
  6. #6

    UI component explorer for frontend developers

    4 users
  7. #7

    Systems language focused on safety, speed, and concurrency

    3 users
  8. #8

    High-level Python web framework for rapid development

    3 users
  9. #9

    Statically typed, compiled language for simple and reliable software

    2 users
  10. #10

    Powerful and intuitive language for Apple platforms

    2 users
  11. #11

    Full-stack framework for Vue.js applications

    2 users
  12. #12

    Modern Python web framework for building APIs

    2 users
  13. #13

    JavaScript runtime built on Chrome's V8 engine

    2 users
  14. #14

    Fast all-in-one JavaScript runtime and toolkit

    2 users
  15. #15

    Ultrafast web framework for the edge, runs everywhere

    2 users
  16. #16

    The language of the web, and the survey's most used language every year

    2 users
  17. #17

    Systems language with zero-cost abstractions

    2 users
  18. #18

    Apple's pre-Swift language for macOS and iOS

    2 users
  19. #19

    Dynamic, functional language for scalable applications on the BEAM

    1 user
  20. #20

    Modern object-oriented language for .NET platform

    1 user
  21. #21

    Server-side scripting language for web development

    1 user
  22. #22

    Language combining object-oriented and functional programming

    1 user
  23. #23

    Dynamic functional Lisp dialect on the JVM

    1 user
  24. #24

    Client-optimized language for fast apps on any platform

    1 user
  25. #25

    Full-stack framework built on Svelte

    1 user
  26. #26

    Web framework for content-driven websites with islands architecture

    1 user
  27. #27

    Full-stack web framework following convention over configuration

    1 user
  28. #28

    PHP web framework with expressive, elegant syntax

    1 user
  29. #29

    Google's UI toolkit for cross-platform native apps

    1 user
  30. #30

    Build native mobile apps using React and JavaScript

    1 user
  31. #31

    Access AJAX, CSS transitions, and more directly in HTML

    1 user
  32. #32

    Reactive JavaScript library for building user interfaces

    1 user
  33. #33

    Text-processing language and the original glue of the web

    1 user
  34. #34

    High-performance language for technical computing

    1 user
  35. #35

    Microsoft's web framework for .NET

    1 user
  36. #36

    Web UI framework running C# in the browser

    1 user
  37. #37

    Minimal MVC library that started the front-end framework era

    1 user
  38. #38

    Full-stack JavaScript platform with real-time data out of the box

    1 user
  39. #39

    Query language and runtime for APIs

    1 user
  40. #40

    Lightweight Python web framework

    1 user
  41. #41

    PHP framework and component library

    1 user
  42. #42

    Cross-platform C++ framework for native GUIs

    1 user
  43. #43

    High-fidelity real-time engine from Epic Games

    1 user
  44. #44

    Python data analysis and dataframe library

    1 user
  45. #45

    Numerical array library at the base of Python's data stack

    1 user
  46. #46

    Machine learning framework with eager execution

    1 user
  47. #47

    ASGI web server for running Python web applications with high performance.

    1 user
  48. #48

    Dynamic language designed for simplicity and productivity

    0 users
  49. #49

    Modern, concise language for JVM and Android development

    0 users
  50. #50

    General-purpose systems language for robust software

    0 users

Rising this month

  • Django 3 added in the last 30 days, 100% of its 3 users
  • Python 4 added in the last 30 days, 80% of its 5 users
  • Storybook 3 added in the last 30 days, 75% of its 4 users
  • Rust 2 added in the last 30 days, 67% of its 3 users
  • TypeScript 2 added in the last 30 days, 40% of its 5 users
  • Next.js 2 added in the last 30 days, 40% of its 5 users
  • Tailwind CSS 2 added in the last 30 days, 40% of its 5 users
  • React 1 added in the last 30 days, 25% of its 4 users

Often paired with

Moves in Languages & Frameworks

I used to write end to end tests for everything. Click this button, fill that form, check the result. It felt safe but every test run took forever and when something broke, all I got was a screenshot showing me a blank form or a missing element. Then I'd have to dig through logs to find which function actually failed. The shift was simple: keep the e2e tests only for the flows that would genuinely tank the business if they stopped working. For me that's user signup, payment processing, and core search. Everything else moved down to integration tests with Vitest where I test the actual functions and API endpoints directly. Now my test suite runs in under a minute instead of ten. When a test fails, Vitest tells me exactly which function broke and why, not just that something on the page is wrong. I can verify a complex checkout flow with an integration test that sets up the database, calls the controller, and checks the response in about thirty lines. The honest caveat is that this approach assumes you have good logging and error handling already in place. If your app swallows errors or logs them poorly, you'll miss bugs that e2e tests would have caught. I also still need the handful of e2e tests because screenshots do catch visual regressions and weird browser quirks that integration tests miss entirely.

75

Before I adopted multi-stage builds, my Go service images were bloated. I'd compile everything inside the container, and then ship the entire build layer to production. The image sat around 800 megabytes because it contained the Go toolchain, git, and every build dependency. That meant every deployment pulled that extra weight, and every running container exposed toolchain binaries that had no business being in production. I restructured my Dockerfile to build in one stage and copy only the final binary into a fresh stage. The first stage does all the compilation work with all the heavy dependencies available. Then I use a `FROM scratch` or `FROM alpine:latest` for the final stage, and I `COPY --from=builder /app/service /service`. The resulting image drops to about 30 megabytes for a typical CLI tool or microservice. Here's the concrete shift: my build stage runs `RUN go build -o /app/service .` with the full Go installation present, but the runtime stage starts from scratch and only contains that single statically-compiled binary. No source code, no build cache, no compiler. The attack surface shrinks because there is literally nothing left to exploit except the binary itself. The caveat is that this approach works cleanly for statically-compiled binaries, which Go excels at, but falls apart if you need runtime dependencies or configuration files. If your service needs shared libraries or certificate bundles, you have to explicitly copy those into the final stage too, which adds back some size and complexity. It is not a universal solution for all container workflows. ```docker FROM golang:1.25-alpine AS builder WORKDIR /src COPY go.mod go.sum ./ RUN go mod download COPY . . RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 go build -o /bin/api ./cmd/api FROM alpine:3.24 RUN apk add --no-cache ca-certificates COPY --from=builder /bin/api /bin/api ENTRYPOINT ["/bin/api"] ```

64

Utility-first CSS has been a game changer for our team's velocity. Inspired by @sarah_chen

63

Adoption history

TypeScript

History
Collected from public datasets outside Stackness, not from stacks on this site. Each series is scaled to its own peak because the units do not compare. Data sources
Mentions, monthly

Hacker News mentions mentions: 1 mentions (2009) to 864 mentions (2026)

20092013201820222026

Imported from Hacker News mentions

Downloads, monthly

npm downloads downloads: 3,408 downloads (2015) to 1,045,925,580 downloads (2026)

20152017202020232026

Imported from npm downloads

Rank, monthly

RedMonk language rankings rank: 17 position (2017) to 6 position (2026)

20172019202120232026

Imported from RedMonk language rankings

Questions asked, monthly

Stack Exchange data explorer questions asked: 1 questions (2009) to 29 questions (2026)

20092016201920232026

Imported from Stack Exchange data explorer

Usage share, yearly

Stack Overflow developer survey usage share: 9.52 % of respondents (2017) to 43.76 % of respondents (2025)

20172019202120232025

Imported from Stack Overflow developer survey

Pageviews, monthly

Wikipedia pageviews pageviews: 13,800 views (2015) to 17,382 views (2026)

20152018202120232026

Imported from Wikipedia pageviews

Python

History
Collected from public datasets outside Stackness, not from stacks on this site. Each series is scaled to its own peak because the units do not compare. Data sources
Mentions, monthly

Hacker News mentions mentions: 43 mentions (2007) to 2,151 mentions (2026)

20072011201620212026

Imported from Hacker News mentions

Rank, monthly

RedMonk language rankings rank: 4 position (2012) to 2 position (2026)

20122015201920222026

Imported from RedMonk language rankings

Questions asked, monthly

Stack Exchange data explorer questions asked: 119 questions (2008) to 142 questions (2026)

20082013201720222026

Imported from Stack Exchange data explorer

Usage share, yearly

Stack Overflow developer survey usage share: 22.52 % of respondents (2011) to 58.13 % of respondents (2025)

20112015201820222025

Imported from Stack Overflow developer survey

Next.js

History
Collected from public datasets outside Stackness, not from stacks on this site. Each series is scaled to its own peak because the units do not compare. Data sources
Mentions, monthly

Hacker News mentions mentions: 11 mentions (2016) to 192 mentions (2026)

20162019202120242026

Imported from Hacker News mentions

Downloads, monthly

npm downloads downloads: 110 downloads (2015) to 211,758,875 downloads (2026)

20152017202020232026

Imported from npm downloads

Questions asked, monthly

Stack Exchange data explorer questions asked: 1 questions (2016) to 5 questions (2026)

20162019202120242026

Imported from Stack Exchange data explorer

Usage share, yearly

Stack Overflow developer survey usage share: 13.79 % of respondents (2022) to 21.46 % of respondents (2025)

2022202320242025

Imported from Stack Overflow developer survey

Pageviews, monthly

Wikipedia pageviews pageviews: 4,943 views (2020) to 10,980 views (2026)

20202022202320252026

Imported from Wikipedia pageviews